Report on BIM’s First ApeBond Campaign

General
, ,
1

Report on BIM’s First ApeBond Campaign

BIM’s first ApeBond campaign was a major milestone for the ecosystem, both financially and strategically.

As part of this first operation, the BIM DAO sold a total of 20,693 BIM.

As of today, 100% of the revenue raised through the ApeBond campaign, combined with revenue generated by the BIM protocol, has been used to buy back BIM from the market.

So far, this strategy has allowed the ecosystem to repurchase a total of 20,931 BIM.

This means:

  • 20,693 BIM were sold by the DAO

  • 20,931 BIM have already been bought back

  • representing 101.15% of the amount initially sold

In other words, the buyback has already exceeded the original amount sold by 238 BIM, making this first campaign globally positive for the BIM ecosystem.

Regarding liquidity reserves, the position increased from 6.74 cbETH to 7.16 cbETH, which reflects a strong increase in reserve value.

It is also important to note that the BIM DAO initially allocated $500 to cover the fees required to launch the operation.

Beyond the numbers, this first ApeBond campaign delivered several important strategic outcomes. It allowed BIM to initiate its partnership with ApeBond, integrate the Bonds feature on BIM Exchange, and launch the buyback program of BIM Exchange.

Since then, the buyback mechanism has continued to operate through protocol revenues, and BIM is now being bought back on a near-daily basis depending on the protocol’s income.

At the present time, no additional ApeBond campaigns are planned.

Overall, this first ApeBond campaign can be considered a success. It enabled the DAO to raise funds, fully recycle the proceeds into the ecosystem through buybacks, strengthen reserves, establish a strategic partnership, and create a long-term buyback dynamic that continues to support BIM today.

2 Likes
2

Wow this great achievement for the bin ecosystem

1 Like
3

Amazing experience working with BIM and a very successful Bonding Buy Back Campaign. When the time is right we would love to work with yall again <3

2 Likes
4

Very strong first execution by the BIM DAO here. Key points that stand out strategically:

• 101.15% recovery efficiency is the biggest signal.
20,693 BIM sold vs 20,931 BIM bought back means the ecosystem already absorbed and exceeded the initial dilution.

• The buyback model proved sustainable beyond the campaign itself.
What started as a fundraising mechanism evolved into a near-daily market buyback engine powered by protocol revenue.

• Reserve growth matters a lot.
Liquidity reserves increasing from 6.74 cbETH to 7.16 cbETH shows the operation strengthened treasury positioning instead of weakening it.

• Capital efficiency was excellent.
Only $500 allocated for operational launch costs while still achieving full recycling of proceeds back into the ecosystem.

• Strategic value goes beyond numbers.
This campaign established:

  • BIM × ApeBond partnership
  • Bonds integration on BIM Exchange
  • Long-term exchange buyback infrastructure
  • Stronger treasury mechanics

• Most important takeaway:
This was not a sell pressure event.
It became a treasury optimization plus ecosystem reinforcement cycle.

DAO raises capital → protocol generates revenue → revenue buys back BIM → reserves strengthen → ecosystem utility expands.

That’s a far healthier model than temporary liquidity extraction.

Also bullish that no additional campaigns are currently planned. It suggests the first objective was execution and infrastructure establishment rather than continuous token emissions.

Overall, this demonstrates disciplined treasury management, responsible capital recycling, and a focus on long-term ecosystem sustainability over short-term optics.

1 Like
5

Solid breakdown. Seeing a 101.15% buyback execution completely neutralizing the initial bond dilution is a massive win for tokenomics sustainability. It proves the protocol revenue loop is actually functional, not just theoretical.

Quick question on the liquidity reserves, the jump from 6.74 to 7.16 cbETH is great, but do we have a breakdown of how much of that growth was pure asset appreciation vs. actual protocol revenue allocation? Also, now that no additional ApeBond campaigns are planned, what’s the primary strategy to sustain this near daily buyback pressure purely through organic protocol income?

2 Likes
6

Yeah, this is a very good question

1 Like
7

Yes, the nearly daily purchases will be funded by revenue from the protocols or by grants received