BIM Exchange could add a detailed comparison panel before each swap or bridge. This feature would show the expected amount received, network and platform fees, slippage, estimated completion time, liquidity source, and relevant smart-contract or bridge risks.
Providing this information upfront would help users make more informed decisions, strengthen trust, and reinforce BIM Exchange’s role as an aggregator of DEX liquidity.
I second, showing fees, slippage, route, ETA and risks upfront makes BIM more transparent and helps users make better decisions.
Thanks for the suggestion — this is actually already implemented across a large part of BIM Exchange.
For many swaps, users can already choose the aggregator/provider directly, with around 5 available options depending on the route. This allows them to compare execution paths and select the one that best fits their needs.
The interface already exposes key execution information such as the expected amount received and route/provider, and we can continue improving the comparison layer by making fees, slippage, execution time, liquidity source, and risk information even more explicit.
So the core idea is already live; the next step is mainly to enhance transparency and readability around each available route.